Unease on the Sheyenne
Valley City residents want outlet impact studyVALLEY CITY, N.D. – Hundreds of residents here are begging state officials to quit using the Devils Lake outlet until more is known about its environmental impacts on the Sheyenne River.
By: Dave Olson, INFORUM
VALLEY CITY, N.D. – Hundreds of residents here are begging state officials to quit using the Devils Lake outlet until more is known about its environmental impacts on the Sheyenne River.
They want an independent study to answer that question, as well as the question of why Devils Lake continues to rise, said Sharon Buhr, an organizer of a petition drive seeking a moratorium on the outlet.
Buhr, who is also the chairwoman of the public health agency serving Valley City and Barnes County, said answers are critical in light of a step the state took in June to ease controls on sulfate levels in certain stretches of the Sheyenne River. This allowed for greater releases through the outlet.
The North Dakota Department of Health is reviewing whether to make the new standards permanent, a decision that could come early next year, said David Glatt, chief of the department’s environmental health section.
Buhr said at a news conference Thursday in downtown Valley City that residents are concerned about harm the proposed rule change might do, not only to Valley City, “but also to the entire third of North Dakota.”
She said that over a six-day period, 700 people signed a petition “begging the state to complete an environmental impact study.”
Madeline Luke, a physician and another organizer of the petition drive, said the 2009 flood showed how dangerous fluctuations in the Sheyenne River can be.
“We came quite close to losing the city. Any increase in water would have put us over our primary dikes,” Luke said, adding that the flood threat exists beyond spring.
“The weather in North Dakota is unpredictable,” said Luke, who lives a block from the river. “If you have a full river, increased flow and then a storm, you get into situations where you don’t have much warning.”
Gary Pearson, a long-time critic of the outlet, said the State Water Commission claimed the outlet would lower Devils Lake by 17 inches after 10 years of operation.
He said from 2005 to 2008, the outlet removed a total of one-tenth of an inch of water from the lake and the lake is 10 inches higher than it was before the outlet began operation.
Pearson said none of the efforts to control Devils Lake address why it is rising and he said the 358,000 acres of wetlands drained in the region over the past 70 years may be worth noting.
“There is an urgent need for a comprehensive, scientific review of the flooding problems at Devils Lake by an independent body that is free of the political pressures that dominate water issues in North Dakota,” Pearson said.
Dale Frink, engineer for the State Water Commission, said wetland drainage hasn’t helped the situation, but he said Devils Lake reached similar levels in the 1800s, before widespread drainage began.
He said snowmelt and precipitation are believed to be the major reasons for the rise in Devils Lake.
The outlet was shut down for the winter at the end of October. Frink said it won’t reopen until an expansion project is completed that will allow for increased outflows if conditions and rules permit it.
Glatt said he doesn’t see the state imposing a moratorium on the outlet, given it is shut down and likely won’t reopen before the state decides whether to permanently raise the sulfate limit on the upper Sheyenne River from 450 milligrams per liter to 750 milligrams per liter.
“I will say the change from 450 to 750 is a level that is protective of aquatic life. EPA (the federal Environmental Protection Agency) has approved that in other states,” Glatt said.
Readers can reach Forum reporter Dave Olson at (701) 241-5555
Tags: devils lake, north dakota, news, sheyenne, flood, audio
Steve J. West Fargo, ND 11/13/2009 10:41 AM
All I can say is just wait until Devils Lake starts flowing naturally across land into the Sheyenne. That flow is predicted at 4 times the flow rate of this past spring. Sandbags probably won't do much. There is a reason there is a valley in Valley City and it wasn't because someone dug a hole.Report a Violation
Jeff S. Fargo, ND 11/13/2009 10:40 AM
interesting in that these people want an environmental study because of the sulfate levels.... but the meat of the problem is around the high water levels not the sulfatesmy take is that the downstream peoples don't want the water and their lever is the sulfate levels which have already been clearedtotally get that no one wants the water, but it needs to go somewhere
Report a Violation
Comments posted on this page DO NOT reflect opinions of Forum Communications Company. Forum Communications Company does not endorse and is not responsible for any statement, opinion, advice given or made. All replies are posted "as is" and must follow Forum Communications Company guidelines concerning statements of libel, personal attacks or defamation of character. If a comment is found in violation of said guidelines it can and will be removed from the public discussion. Replies in the "Talk About It" section that criticize a person by name may not be posted, unless that person is openly involved in a public issue. Comments written in all capital letters or bold print will not be considered for inclusion in INFORUM.



Mike S. Moorhead, MN 11/13/2009 1:25 PM
C S. in Devils Lake is right. Those who live on the Sheyenne better decide if they want a controlled release from the "cleaner" western part of Devils Lake, or if they want an uncontrolled release from the "dirty" eastern part of Devils Lake through Stump Lake. The controlled outlet isn't started until after the snow melts in the spring, and can stopped if necessary. But, once that water starts flowing out from Stump Lake, I don't think you can build levies high enough and fast enough. The flow will start to erode the natural banks holding the water back, causing the flow to increase, causing more erosion, etc.Report a Violation