WDAY.com |

North Dakota's #1 news website 10,650,498 page views — March 2014

Published June 08, 2012, 04:15 PM

Checking accounts still too confusing, study finds

WASHINGTON — Despite some recent improvements by the nation’s largest banks, checking accounts are still too confusing for consumers and overdraft fees are too high, according to new findings by the Pew Charitable Trusts.

By: Los Angeles Times, INFORUM

WASHINGTON — Despite some recent improvements by the nation’s largest banks, checking accounts are still too confusing for consumers and overdraft fees are too high, according to new findings by the Pew Charitable Trusts.

Disclosures for checking accounts are too long, some fees for overdraft protection have increased, and many consumers still are forced into binding arbitration to settle disputes with their bank, said the study released Friday by Pew’s Safe Checking in the Electronic Age Project.

“Consumers are expected to wade through long, confusing documents and may be subject to steep, unexpected fees to access their own checking accounts, the cornerstone of household financial management,” said Susan Weinstock, the project’s director. “Consumers must have understandable, transparent information that enables them to make educated choices when comparing one checking account’s costs and benefits to another.”

Pew used the findings to continue to push regulators to force banks to provide better disclosure and make overdraft fees proportional to the banks’ costs.

The study is an update to the project’s 2011 report, “Hidden Risks: The Case for Safe and Transparent Checking Accounts,” which raised alarms about fees and disclosures at the nation’s 10 largest banks. This time, Pew looked at the practices at the 12 largest banks, as well as the 12 largest credit unions in a follow-up report titled “Still Risky: An Update on the Safety and Transparency of Checking Accounts.”

Improvements in key areas have been minimal, said the new report, which compared the original data, from 2010, with new data collected in October.

The median length of bank checking account disclosures has decreased to 69 pages from 111 pages in the earlier report. But the disclosures still are too cumbersome and “important policies and fee information are not summarized in a uniform, concise, and easy-to-understand format that allows customers to compare account terms and condition,” Pew said.

Overdraft fees are an area of particular concern. Pew found that financial institutions do not provide clear and detailed information about options for overdraft protection and their costs. Many banks and credit unions have three options with very different fees and features, but “consumers may not be aware of lower-cost options.”

The median overdraft fees for large banks remains $35, the same as in the first report. But more checking accounts now come with an extended overdraft penalty fee, which kicks in if the overdraft is not repaid in a timely manner. The median extended overdraft fee has increased 32 percent since the first report.

The report also said consumers still faced hurdles in settling disputes. Of the 237 different checking accounts offered by the largest banks, 66 percent forced customers to submit any disputes to binding arbitration, down from 71 percent in the first report. But the percentage of accounts that force customers to pay the bank’s losses, costs and expenses from the dispute, regardless of who wins, has increased to 32 percent from 12 percent.


©2012 Los Angeles Times

Visit the Los Angeles Times at www.latimes.com

Distributed by MCT Information Services

Tags: