DIVERSION DISCUSSION
Showing 1 - 16 of 31 | next page
Start a blog »
Blog posts related to this topic:
STAFF BLOG DIVERSION DISCUSSION DIVERSION DISCUSSION: Corps officials: 'Don’t wait’ to lobby for project on Capitol Hill
FARGO Regional officials with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers are advising Fargo-Moorhead leaders to resume their lobbying efforts in Washington as early as this fall. The Diversion Authority suspe...
Posted on 8/26/12 at 9:05 AM
Diversion Discussion: Corps officials say ‘don’t wait’ to lobby for F-M diversion on Capitol Hill 
FARGO - Regional officials with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers are advising Fargo-Moorhead leaders to resume their lobbying efforts in Washington as early as this fall.
August 26, 2012
RELATED CONTENT
Diversion Discussion: Officials hope to wrap up several studies, agreements by Sept.
FARGO - The next four months are going to be a busy and pivotal time for the Red River diversion project.
July 14, 2012
RELATED CONTENT
Diversion Discussion: Proposed meandering channel draws questions from authority board
FARGO - It’s one thing to hear or read about specific design for the Red River diversion project.
June 23, 2012
RELATED CONTENT
Diversion Discussion: Corps aims to inform contractors with industry workshop
FARGO - Wednesday is the deadline for contractors and suppliers to register for an upcoming workshop on the Red River diversion project.
June 16, 2012
RELATED CONTENT
Diversion Discussion: Array of farm-related issues yet to be decided
Members of the Diversion Authority’s new Agricultural Policy Subcommittee quickly discovered Wednesday night how much work they have ahead of them.
The group’s first meeting lasted more than two hours as members broached a variety of issues they hope to discuss in the months ahead.
June 02, 2012
RELATED CONTENT
Diversion Discussion: FEMA, corps 100-year flood definitions differ
FARGO - At what Red River level is a 100-year flood in Fargo-Moorhead?
Scientifically speaking, the answer depends on the source of information: the Federal Emergency Management Agency or the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
May 19, 2012
RELATED CONTENT
Diversion Discussion: Drayton dam will mitigate fish passage limitations of diversion
FARGO - One feature of the Red River diversion project isn’t close to Fargo-Moorhead.
May 12, 2012
RELATED CONTENT
Diversion Discussion: Channel design to ramp up this summer
FARGO - Initial design work on the Red River diversion is progressing on time and under budget so far, and it’s about to get a lot more intense.
May 05, 2012
RELATED CONTENT
Diversion Discussion: Minnesota plan, although economical, was not favored local solution
FARGO - Not so long ago, Minnesota could have been an alternative home for a Red River diversion around Fargo-Moorhead.
April 28, 2012
RELATED CONTENT
Diversion Discussion: Corps says dredging not feasible for permanent flood protection
FARGO - Among debates over the proposed Red River diversion, critics continue to suggest one potential solution that they say would only affect land in and near the river channel: dredging.
April 14, 2012
RELATED CONTENT
Diversion Discussion: Opponents tout retention upsides
FARGO - Rural opponents of the Red River diversion project have a reasoned message for the Diversion Authority and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers:
Stop. Pause for a moment.
April 07, 2012
RELATED CONTENT
Diversion Discussion: GOP House candidates weigh in on F-M diversion
FARGO - Today’s “Diversion Discussion” is the culmination of a three-week effort to share how all Democratic and Republican candidates in North Dakota’s gubernatorial, U.S. House and U.S. Senate races feel about the Red River diversion plans.
April 01, 2012
RELATED CONTENT
Diversion Discussion: Republican candidates have their say on flood control project
FARGO - North Dakota Republicans endorse their candidates in this year’s state and federal races next weekend in Bismarck.
March 24, 2012
RELATED CONTENT
Diversion Discussion: Democratic candidates weigh in on Fargo-Moorhead flood control project
FARGO - Both of North Dakota’s political parties are gathering this month to select their slate of candidates in the state’s key races this year.
March 17, 2012
RELATED CONTENT
Diversion Discussion: How would the diversion affect you?
When talking casually about the Red River diversion project, it’s easy for people to focus on the basics:
The $1.8 billion cost. The complicated technical engineering. Or the sheer scope of the massive channel and its features.
March 10, 2012
RELATED CONTENT
Showing 1 - 16 of 31 | next page
View your ad here! Cost effective targeted advertising.
Contextual advertising starting as low as $79/month. This includes targeted ad delivery and search results!
Add your business to the Marketplace »
RSS Feeds