Sponsored By
An organization or individual has paid for the creation of this work but did not approve or review it.

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Outlet opponents argue against revised permit

BISMARCK - The state Health Department should have reviewed the risk of Devils Lake water degrading the Sheyenne River before it issued a revised permit for the Devils Lake outlet last year, outlet opponents argued at the North Dakota Supreme Cou...

BISMARCK - The state Health Department should have reviewed the risk of Devils Lake water degrading the Sheyenne River before it issued a revised permit for the Devils Lake outlet last year, outlet opponents argued at the North Dakota Supreme Court on Wednesday.

The revised permit allowed the state Water Commission, which operates the outlet, to discharge more sulfates and suspended solids with the lake water than in a 2003 permit. It also granted a longer operating season per year.

Permitted sulfates were allowed to rise from 300 milligrams per liter of water to 450.

The Water Commission asked for a looser standard last year because from the time the outlet first began operating in 2005, water from the lake has often exceeded the original level of permitted sulfates.

State law dictates re-review of possible harm when major changes in a discharge permit are sought, said the opponents' lawyer, Bill Delmore. Not doing a degradation review "does not seem like a way to protect the waters of the state."

ADVERTISEMENT

Delmore represents the government of Manitoba and three groups - People to Save the Sheyenne River Inc., Peterson Coulee Outlet Association and the National Wildlife Federation.

But Dean Haas, the state Health Department's attorney, said Delmore's claim that a degradation review wasn't done is not true.

"It was done," Haas told the justices.

Sulfates are common in drinking water and higher sulfate concentrations have a diarrhea effect. They also render water unfit for irrigation, Delmore said. Total suspended solids refer to extremely small particles in water that do not settle out by gravity.

Delmore also said the outlet is essentially a failure and the efficacy of a project should be factored into whether it should have a permit to operate.

Based on the state Water Commission's own records, the outlet has, in three years of operating only occasionally, dropped the swollen Devils Lake by 1/37 of an inch, Delmore said. He said that would have uncovered about an acre of flooded land.

That hardly justifies the outlet's $28 million cost, he said.

The lake, which has no natural outlet, began rising in 1993 and continued most years afterward due to a wet cycle in the area. It has inundated cropland, houses, farmsteads and forests. The outlet is a system to lower the lake by pumping the water into the Sheyenne River.

ADVERTISEMENT

Chief Justice Gerald VandeWalle asked Haas, "Isn't it true the outlet didn't operate the way you - the agencies (expected)," and that prompted a request for a revised permit?

Outlet opponents challenged the outlet's original Health Department permit and lost before the Supreme Court in 2005.

The court took this case under advisement after Wednesday's arguments and will issue a decision later.

Cole works for Forum Communications Co., which owns The Forum. She can be reached at (701) 224-0830 or forumcap@btinet.net

Outlet opponents argue against revised permit Janell Cole 20071011

What To Read Next
Get Local

ADVERTISEMENT