ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Pipeline company threatens court action if ND landowner rejects construction right-of-way

BISMARCK - The company proposing the biggest crude oil pipeline yet out of North Dakota's Oil Patch has informed at least one landowner that it is prepared to go to court to obtain right-of-way for the underground pipeline.

We are part of The Trust Project.

BISMARCK – The company proposing the biggest crude oil pipeline yet out of North Dakota's Oil Patch has informed at least one landowner that it is prepared to go to court to obtain right-of-way for the underground pipeline.

Robert Ferebee, who raises crops and cattle near Halliday, received a letter dated Aug. 28 from Dakota Access LLC giving him one week to accept the company's final compensation offer for an easement on his land or else the offer would be withdrawn.

Ferebee said he didn't respond and hasn't heard anything more from the company.

"So now eminent domain is threatened against me," he said Tuesday.

Vicki Granado, spokeswoman for Dallas-based Energy Transfer Partners, which owns 45 percent of Dakota Access, said the company doesn't discuss its negotiations with landowners.

ADVERTISEMENT

However, she said the company is working to secure voluntary easement agreements for the Dakota Access Pipeline and has not commenced any eminent domain or condemnation proceedings, calling that "always the option of last resort for us."

Dakota Access has secured voluntary easement agreements for 74 percent of the 788 tracts it needs in North Dakota for the $3.78 billion pipeline, she said.

Ferebee said he's not opposed to the 1,134-mile pipeline, which would begin near Stanley and cross South Dakota and Iowa on its way to Patoka, Ill., where crude would be shipped to Midwest and Gulf Coast refineries.

But he said the route the company has proposed would cut across about 400 acres of his farmland and devalue a total of 1,000 acres. He's asked that the company reroute the pipeline to run it parallel to a Tesoro oil pipeline for which his grandfather granted an easement in 1951.

"It's not about the money because I don't need the money," he said. "I want this to be passed on to the next generation. That's my whole point."

Ferebee's reroute request is one of two giving the state Public Service Commission pause as it considers granting a route permit for the pipeline.

During a work session Monday, the three-member panel signaled satisfaction with 17 reroutes agreed upon by both the landowners and company.

But they're debating how to proceed with the other two requested reroutes, both of which would affect landowners outside the original project corridor proposed by the company.

ADVERTISEMENT

Granado said the company plans to start construction immediately upon gaining the necessary permits and approvals - which it anticipates will be early next year - and to have the pipeline in service by the fourth quarter of 2016.

The company has secured the necessary shipping commitments from oil producers and the pipeline will initially transport up to 450,000 barrels of crude per day, with capacity for as much as 570,000 barrels daily, she said.

What to read next
Use of a two-drug combination now make up over half of all abortions in the United States, according to the Guttmacher Institute, an abortion research organization. About 350,000 Google searches using those terms or "abortion pill" were conducted during the week of May 1 to 8, according to the authors of the new research letter. That first week in May is when the Supreme Court's decision that would overturn Roe v. Wade was leaked and widely reported.
When information suggesting that he U.S. Supreme Court may overturn Roe v. Wade leaked in May, internet searches about abortion drugs surged to an all-time high. In this episode of NewsMD's "Health Fusion," Viv Williams checks out a study that explored the issue and shares what the researchers say people and health care providers should know.
The person diagnosed with West Nile virus lives in Richland County in southeast North Dakota and was not hospitalized.
Members Only
In February, the news broke that Mayo Clinic would not treat patients covered by UnitedHealthcare’s Medicare Advantage insurance plan. The two Minnesota health care giants have now “reached an agreement on a new, multi-year network relationship.”