We see that you have javascript disabled. Please enable javascript and refresh the page to continue reading local news. If you feel you have received this message in error, please contact the customer support team at 1-833-248-7801.



McFeely: Will taxpayers be left out in the cold by Project Tundra?

Carbon capture project boosted by Hoeven, others is a long shot to succeed given history of similar propositions

Minnkota Power Cooperative's Milton R. Young Station, near Center, N.D., burns lignite coal to generate electricity for customers in eastern North Dakota and northwestern Minnesota. In 2017, North Dakota coal-fired power plants produced 2.7 million tons of coal ash, which must be properly disposed of and monitored. Special to The Forum
We are part of The Trust Project.

FARGO — U.S. Sen. John Hoeven's office regularly brags about the federal money he's helped secure for Project Tundra , North Dakota's desperate attempt to save its coal industry. A recent press release said the total is up to $43 million.

Bringing home the bacon for pet projects is still the hallmark of a politician, no matter how misguided those projects might be.

And make no mistake. There is mounting evidence that Project Tundra is misguided.

Project Tundra is an attempt by Minnkota Power Cooperative, the University of North Dakota's Energy and Environmental Research Center, the North Dakota Industrial Commission and the Lignite Energy Council to install a carbon capture system at the Milton R. Young Station, a coal-fired power plant near Center, N.D.

The belief is that by reducing carbon dioxide emissions, aging coal plants are made more palatable as climate change becomes a bigger issue.


Hoeven has been the project's top political cheerleader, funneling taxpayer money toward it as a member of two powerful Senate committees. He's also championed federal tax credits for carbon capture. The state's Industrial Commission pitched in $15 million.


  • In meetings with U.S. Secretary of Energy, North Dakota leaders, industry voices call for deregulation Energy secretary Dan Brouillette met with North Dakota senators and Gov. Doug Burgum Tuesday for a medley of North Dakota energy events, touting aims to deregulate the coal and oil industries.
  • Letter: Look to next generation technologies like carbon capture
  • Letter: Recent cold snap reaffirms importance of Project Tundra

Who says fossil fuels don't get subsidized?
The stated goal behind Project Tundra is to retrofit North Dakota's coal-burning plants with carbon capture to reduce emissions and then pipe the carbon to the Bakken fields for injection into oil wells in a process known as enhanced oil recovery.

At its core, Project Tundra is meant to keep North Dakota's coal-burning power plants and coal mines from going extinct. It's a jobs and economical play, with Hoeven and others hoping government seed money can attract private investment dollars. Thus the tens of millions of taxpayer dollars that have gone into the estimated $1.5 billion project so far.

Just one small problem: There isn't one example of a successful carbon-capture project on a coal-fired power plant anywhere in North America. Every other attempt at a Project Tundra-like proposition has failed.

They've been deemed unreliable, technologically unsound and financially unsustainable.


Just last month, the lone U.S. project capturing carbon from a coal-fired power plant was mothballed after mechanical and financial problems mounted. That was the Petra Nova plant in Texas, pointed to by Project Tundra boosters as an example of what they envision in North Dakota.

Instead, Petra Nova and its $190 million in taxpayer help have been shuttered indefinitely while Project Tundra forges ahead.

Is this a good use of taxpayer dollars?

At least one think tank doesn't believe so. The Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis said Petra Nova was a loser for investors during its brief four-year lifespan.

"Investors would do well to conduct their due diligence before investing in any coal-fired (carbon capture) projects. The performance at Petra Nova raises serious questions about the viability of such projects," the think tank wrote. "Investors would be wise to demand answers to those questions. The project’s backers are selling a dream; it is investors' responsibility to understand that dream could easily turn into a nightmare."

If Petra Nova was the model for Project Tundra, North Dakotans should be asking whether it will have a similar nightmare on its hands.

Mike McFeely is a columnist for The Forum of Fargo-Moorhead. He began working for The Forum in the 1980s while he was a student studying journalism at Minnesota State University Moorhead. He's been with The Forum full time since 1990, minus a six-year hiatus when he hosted a local radio talk-show.
What to read next
Did Rep. Jason Dockter, a Bismarck-area Republican, really think that this sort of dealing, assuming it's all technically in compliance with state law, would pass the smell test with the public? If he didn't, he's a fool, and if he did, you have to wonder why he went ahead with it anyway.
Sept. 4 comes and goes with a blur for many. For me there are three dates: Sept. 4, 1863; Sept. 4, 2016, and Sept. 4, 2022. This is really about the Indian Wars, which continue. I think it’s time to end the Indian Wars. It’s also time to understand that forensic facts, are not “critical race theory,” they are what happened. As school begins, let us ensure that history is taught, and that we make good choices today.
On this episode of Plain Talk, Republican secretary of state candidate Michael Howe debated Democratic-NPL candidate Jeffrey Powell on a wide-ranging set of issues related ot that office.
"41-year-old Shannon Brandt confessed to running down 18-year-old Cayler Ellingson after a street dance earlier this month. Was it really the case of a blood-thirsty Leftist fueled by Joe Biden's recent anti-MAGA rhetoric? Too soon to tell, but not too soon to exploit the tragedy for political advantage."