ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Omdahl: Stopping the slaughter in schools

"Because the Republican majority will not act on any facet of gun regulation, even the abolition of AR-15s, it is time for the people to put reasonable gun regulations measures on the ballot that most North Dakotans will support," writes InForum columnist Lloyd Omdahl.

1DYrk28GmOf1DFSJ6MPOdfYxKfVsdgjCb_0_2_1.jpg
We are part of The Trust Project.

We had free access to guns when I was growing up. Common gun sense ruled the country. There was seldom the kind of mass shootings of kids as we see occurring today.

Ironically, the strongest defenders of our killing gun culture are also the same people who allegedly stand for sanctity of life on the abortion question. When guns are involved, sanctity of life goes down the drain.

Most gun owners, from single shot pistols to AR-15s, argue that these are necessary for self-defense. But if you know the figures you will know that more kids are being shot in schools than burglars shot in bedrooms.

In North Dakota, 55% of adult households have guns. Only 15% of adult households in New Jersey have guns compared to Mississippi with 56%. Since New Jersey has fewer guns for self-defense, are more New Jersyites killed than heavily-armed Mississippians? I think the facts would prove that the self-defense argument is pretty hollow, considering the number of children who have been slaughtered in recent months.

But Eric Hoffer, in his insightful book about “true believers,” says that logic and/or common sense will not change people who are irrational about an issue. The psychological underpinning of gun ownership is the problem and that would require psychoanalysis to detect.

ADVERTISEMENT

Even though a majority of North Dakotans own guns, it doesn’t mean that they are “true believers” beyond the reach of common sense. If the abolition and buy-back of all AR-15s was on the ballot, it would pass.

The legislature will do nothing about the abuse of guns. As an institution, it can be bought by the National Rifle Association. As individuals, a large majority of legislators have been rated so high by the NRA that there is little hope to change their commitment no matter how many kids are murdered.

In North Dakota electoral history, we find that the legislature has not always been in tune with the mood of the public. Many referred measures have reversed action of the legislature. These reversals suggest that they are often representing themselves rather than the constituents who elected them.

It was over the legislature’s opposition that the ethics commission was created and medical marijuana was approved.

Because the Republican majority will not act on any facet of gun regulation, even the abolition of AR-15s, it is time for the people to put reasonable gun regulations measures on the ballot that most North Dakotans will support.

Killing children should go beyond partisan politics, but Republican legislators have drawn their line in the sand, opening the possibility for the Democrats to go to the electorate with the issue. Since the issue has already been politicized, Democrats would have nothing to lose.

A gun debate would also force serious soul-searching by the more radical gun advocates. They would have to reconcile their moral values with their immoral actions, especially if they are professing Christians.

We have become the most killing nation on the earth. Christians can’t just wring their hands. In the Book of Romans, I am told that even if I don’t do any shooting I am guilty because I have given my consent to evil with my silence.

ADVERTISEMENT

Life is sacred. Yet we think a gun is more important.

What’s wrong with us?

Omdahl is a former N.D. lieutenant governor and retired University of North Dakota political science teacher. Email ndmatters@midco.net

This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of The Forum's editorial board nor Forum ownership.

READ MORE FROM LLOYD OMDAHL
Omdahl writes, "Parties are seldom formed until they are mobilized by an issue that has broad appeal. We have had individuals run as third party candidates but they failed because their causes didn’t have a popular base."

Opinion by Lloyd Omdahl
Omdahl is a former N.D. lieutenant governor and retired University of North Dakota political science teacher. Email ndmatters@midco.net

What to read next
Ferragut writes about the Jan. 6th Committee hearings.
I'm just not seeing a constituency of North Dakota voters that Mund could appeal to that's large enough to lead her to victory. But, again, that's assuming that she's running to win, and not as a way to keep her celebrity alive post-Miss America.
"An 80 mph wind ripped through our farmstead near Larimore, North Dakota, toppling trees, some of which landed in inopportune places."
Former Miss America Cara Mund announced on social media she will run as an independent for North Dakota's lone seat in the U.S. House of Representatives, joining incumbent Republican Armstrong and his Democratic challenger Mark Haugen. The election is three months away and until Mund dropped this bombshell, the state was headed to another snoozer election cycle.