We see that you have javascript disabled. Please enable javascript and refresh the page to continue reading local news. If you feel you have received this message in error, please contact the customer support team at 1-833-248-7801.

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Port: A national abortion ban isn't any more constitutional than Roe v. Wade was

Abortion became a hugely contentious issue because the courts took away our ability to answer this policy question through the democratic process. The last thing we need is for Congress to similarly rob us of that ability.

2633657+abortion.jpg
Demonstrators hold signs outside the U.S. Supreme Court on June 27, 2016.
Kevin Lamarque / Reuters
We are part of The Trust Project.

MINOT, N.D. — For decades after a previous iteration of the U.S. Supreme Court, with the Roe v. Wade decision, struck down state-level abortion bans, conservatives have argued that the ruling was unconstitutional.

We were right, as the current iteration of the court recognized in the Dobbs decision. Not one clause, section, or article was written into the U.S. Constitution with the intent to create a right to an abortion. The courts operate outside of their constitutional mandate when they manufacture new rights with judicial fiat.

With its original Roe decision, the Supreme Court stepped on state sovereignty. Whatever your position on abortion, overturning Roe was a victory for American federalism.

But now some Republicans are abandoning the federalist argument on abortion to pursue a federal-level abortion ban.

I'm talking about Sen. Lindsey Graham's proposed 15-week abortion ban . His policy would let more severe restrictions on abortion, such as North Dakota's near-total ban, stand as law, but it wouldn't allow any state to permit abortions after 15 weeks.

ADVERTISEMENT

MORE FROM ROB PORT
If we don't like pink, I'm open to another color. Like baby blue. Or a nice aquamarine color. We can workshop it. Whatever we come up with, it should serve as a reminder that law enforcement should be about safety, both for the cops and for the public, and not some action-movie fantasy.
Did Rep. Jason Dockter, a Bismarck-area Republican, really think that this sort of dealing, assuming it's all technically in compliance with state law, would pass the smell test with the public? If he didn't, he's a fool, and if he did, you have to wonder why he went ahead with it anyway.
On this episode of Plain Talk, Republican secretary of state candidate Michael Howe debated Democratic-NPL candidate Jeffrey Powell on a wide-ranging set of issues related ot that office.
We conservatives should make our choices — from whether to buy a gun to what sort of immigration policy we prefer — based on what's workable and in line with our principles. Not on how it will make liberals react.
Mund, who got into this race late, who has zero track record outside of campaign-trail statements to illustrate how she might vote in Congress, is trying to be all things to all people, and in politics, that's an excellent way to make most people not like you.

What Graham intended, I think, was to try and organize Republicans around a more moderate view on abortion that is palatable to a larger swath of the American electorate. From that perspective, it's not a bad idea.

Poll after poll tells us that a 15-week ban is in the ballpark of what most Americans want when it comes to abortion policy.
According to extensive research by the Pew Foundation only 19% of Americans, including just 21% of women and just 30% of Democrats, think abortion should be legal in all instances without restrictions. Just 8% believe the opposite, that abortion should be illegal in all instances. A 56% majority, including 55% of women and 52% of Democrats, believe the length of time a woman should be pregnant should matter in determining whether abortion should be legal.

A 55% majority are supportive of abortion bans beginning at 14 weeks.

What Graham is proposing is in line with what I support. I don't think total abortion bans are workable, as a practical matter of law. A 15-week ban seems a good compromise. But there remains the question of federalism.

I know it's a bit old-fashioned of me to insist on consistency in this age when principles are situational, and pliable for the sake of expediency, but the federal government has no more authority, under the Constitution, to implement a national ban on abortion than it making state-level abortion bans illegal.

No part of the Constitution gives the federal government this authority. The Constitution, as the Supreme Court found in the Dobbs decision, and as is clear to anyone who has ever read the document, says nothing about abortion.

Thus, it is a policy to be decided by the states, not Congress. As the 10th Amendment states, "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."

RELATED:
Check out "Rhythm of Japan in ND" and four other things in the Fargo-Moorhead area to get out and do this weekend.
Running for reelection, Ellison spoke strongly in support of the clinic and a woman’s right to choose on Wednesday, Sept. 14.
A group called Mothers Offering Maternal Support is attempting to intervene after Ramsey County Judge Thomas Gilligan in July tossed several laws restricting abortion, including a 24-hour wait period and a requirement for minors to notify both parents before getting the procedure. Democratic Attorney General Keith Ellison, who backs abortion rights, declined to file an appeal in the case, arguing his office had spent three years and more than half a million dollars defending the laws in the case Doe v. Minnesota.
Now confronted with a challenge from the other side of the abortion debate, Republican nominee for Minnesota attorney general Jim Schultz continues to downplay the issue’s importance in the race. He argues the attorney general’s office ultimately has very little influence over abortion policy in the state of Minnesota and said the question is fundamentally for the legislature to decide.
Last month, Burleigh County District Judge Bruce Romanick blocked the state's abortion ban from taking effect.
Critics say warnings over "post-abortion syndrome" are unsupported by the best evidence and that the state Positive Alternatives Grant Program should not be funding crisis pregnancy centers that endorse it.

Abortion became a hugely contentious issue because the courts took away our ability to answer this policy question through the democratic process. The last thing we need is for Congress to similarly rob us of that ability.

ADVERTISEMENT

Some states have chosen total bans on abortion, which are foolish and extreme and poor policy.

Other states may choose a stance on abortion so permissive that it allows them right up to a mother's due date, a position that is similarly foolish and extreme.

But whatever position the states take, it should be up to those states, and the people who live there, who will engage in legislative bills and ballot measures all aimed at shaping policy around this most controversial of issues.

It will be hard, but this is what our system of federalist democracy demands of us.

Opinion by Rob Port
Rob Port is a news reporter, columnist, and podcast host for the Forum News Service. He has an extensive background in investigations and public records. He has covered political events in North Dakota and the upper Midwest for two decades. Reach him at rport@forumcomm.com. Click here to subscribe to his Plain Talk podcast.
What to read next
Sept. 4 comes and goes with a blur for many. For me there are three dates: Sept. 4, 1863; Sept. 4, 2016, and Sept. 4, 2022. This is really about the Indian Wars, which continue. I think it’s time to end the Indian Wars. It’s also time to understand that forensic facts, are not “critical race theory,” they are what happened. As school begins, let us ensure that history is taught, and that we make good choices today.
"41-year-old Shannon Brandt confessed to running down 18-year-old Cayler Ellingson after a street dance earlier this month. Was it really the case of a blood-thirsty Leftist fueled by Joe Biden's recent anti-MAGA rhetoric? Too soon to tell, but not too soon to exploit the tragedy for political advantage."
On my walks in Grand Forks, I often meet people I know, and sometimes long conversations ensue. Face-to-face conversations.
Further reporting suggests "Wrigley echoed what the Trump legal team would ultimately pursue in having fake electors sent to Congress on January 6 to have the then vice-president, Mike Pence, refuse to certify Biden’s win."