Port: Bill Gates shouldn't have needed a loophole in the law to buy land in North Dakota

Gates and his trust will own the land, and the family who sold it to him will farm it, and that's all legal under the law.

Bill Gates.JPG
Microsoft founder Bill Gates is seen at the EU Commission headquarters in Brussels, in this file photo taken January 22, 2015.
REUTERS/Francois Lenoir/Files
We are part of The Trust Project.

MINOT, N.D. — North Dakota's ban on corporate farming is stupid.

It cannot be reconciled with our society's foundational notions about property rights and free association. Willing buyers should be able to purchase land from willing sellers. People who want to farm or ranch on that land should be able to organize their businesses with more than just family.

I had thought, when news first broke that Attorney General Drew Wrigley was looking into a multi-million dollar land sale made by a trust controlled by tech industry billionaire Bill Gates, that we might see a legal challenge that would strike down North Dakota's corporate farming ban once and for all.

Alas, it is not to be. Wrigley told me on Monday that he'd sent a letter to the Red River Trust to gather information about the transaction. The information provided by legal counsel for the trust indicates that the land sale is legal, under existing law, because the trust which will own the land is operated for the benefit of one person, Bill Gates, and the land itself will be leased to a partnership that will farm the land.

Here are the communications between Wrigley's office and lawyers for the trust.


The pertinent exemption in North Dakota law is section 10-06.1-09 of the North Dakota Century Code which states: "A nonprofit organization or a trust for the benefit of an individual or a class of individuals related within the degrees of kinship specified in subsection 2 of section 10-06.1-12 may own or lease farmland or ranchland if that land is leased to a person who farms or ranches the land as a sole proprietorship or partnership, or a corporation or limited liability company allowed to engage in farming or ranching under section 10-06.1-12."

The North Dakota Republican Party no longer has any obligation to pretend as though Rick Becker is a member in good standing, whatever Becker himself might have to say about it.
Let's not forget who it was that thought it a good idea for the school board to open this front in the culture war. Serving on a school board is not a license to indulge in personal political vendettas.
The home of Charles Tuttle, who helped organize signature-gathering efforts for the ballot measure, was search by Bureau of Criminal Investigation personnel.
If elected, Mund would have to choose a party to work with. Who would she choose? Maybe she'll refuse to answer, just as she's refused to answer who she voted for in 2020.
When Rick Becker was seeking the North Dakota GOP's nomination, he said he intended to respect the vote of the convention delegates. That was his explanation for not continuing to pursue the nomination on the June primary ballot. Yet here we are in August, and Becker is reigniting his campaign, collecting signatures so that he can appear on the November ballot as an independent.

The Red River Trust is controlled by a single person. Namely, Bill Gates.

His trust is going to lease the land back to the people that sold it to him - the Campbell family, which includes former Republican state Senator Tom Campbell - for the purposes of farming.

Gates and his trust will own the land, and the Campbells will farm it, and that's all legal under the law.

Though, again, there shouldn't need to be a loophole in the law to allow this sort of thing. If the Campbells want to sell their land, they should be able to. And Bill Gates, through his trust, should be able to lease it to whomever he'd like.

Supporters of North Dakota's corporate farming ban like to imagine that it's protecting family farms. Only, even if we concede that the family farm is a viable business model in the 21st century that should be protected from alternatives by the government, it's not the least bit clear, as the number of farm businesses in North Dakota dwindle, that the corporate farming ban is accomplishing any such thing.

Opinion by Rob Port
Rob Port is a news reporter, columnist, and podcast host for the Forum News Service. He has an extensive background in investigations and public records. He has covered political events in North Dakota and the upper Midwest for two decades. Reach him at Click here to subscribe to his Plain Talk podcast.
What to read next
Some people claim the devil himself visited the tiny town of Villisca, Iowa, that summer night in 1912, when 8 people were killed by an ax murderer. Others say he already lived among them. After more than a century of idle gossip and speculation, some amateur sleuths might have just figured it out.
Breaking News
In memo, Tracie Newman says she doesn't want controversy to divert board resources away from preparing for school year
Move comes after Gov. Burgum says he'll push for law ensuring students, government bodies be given 'opportunity' to say pledge
Sure it's silly for Republicans to be this riled up over the Pledge of Allegiance. But they're apparently talking vengeance. Sometimes it's best to play the political game.