SUBSCRIBE NOW Get a year of news PLUS a gift box!



Port: Of course lawmakers should get their meals paid for

Their compensation should be more generous than it is. If it's not, the only people who will serve in the Legislature will be retirees and rich people.

N.D. Capitol building.jpg
The North Dakota State Capitol building in Bismarck. (Photo/ North Dakota Game and Fish Department)
We are part of The Trust Project.

MINOT, N.D. — Pay for public officials, as an issue, has always been a handy can of gasoline for a certain breed of obnoxious populist ninny to pour on the fires of public discord.

It is fashionable among the hoi polloi to dislike those in elected office (forgetting, I suppose, the identity of the idiots who elected them). The seeds of resentment toward compensation for elected officials often find fertile ground with the electorate.

That's the case with legislation currently under consideration in Bismarck, which would provide a modest daily allowance for meals payable to those lawmakers who live outside of the state capital. House Bill 1424 , introduced by Rep. Keith Kempenich, R-Bowman, would let lawmakers claim up to $35 per day for meals while the Legislature is in session.

This is the same amount state employees claim while traveling.

The bill's cost, per two-year budget cycle, is estimated at $424,000 or about $3,340 for each of the 127 lawmakers who would currently qualify.


21-0849-01000 by Rob Port on Scribd

Kempenich hasn't done his cause any favors by introducing this bill as a sort of rebuttal to new ethics rules which prohibit lawmakers from accepting gifts, including meals, from lobbyists. The aforementioned ninnies are seizing on this parallel because it's good politics, but as we should know by now, good politics does not always mean good policy.

Whatever the motivations for Kempenich's bill, it is good policy. Serving the state as a lawmaker is not a good way for anyone to get rich. Lawmakers make about $13,500 each in total compensation (including their pay and health benefits) during even-numbered years when there is no session in Bismarck, and about $41,500 each in odd-numbered years when there is a session.

Lawmakers outside of Bismarck also get reimbursed for mileage and, when the session is on, housing.

For the amount of work they do, the pay is a pittance.

Could you afford to take five months off from your day job every other year to serve in a session where you're expected to consider thousands of proposed bills in no more than 80 days?

Even when there is no session, lawmakers are expected to travel to Bismarck frequently to attend committee hearings. If they're doing their jobs right, they will also attend many local government meetings, not to mention events put on by nonprofits and civic groups in their districts.


They're on-call for constituents, too, which means meeting in Bismarck all week during the session and then driving back to their legislative districts (some of which are, geographically speaking, enormous) where they spend their weekends attending community forums.

I'm not trying to evoke sympathy. These people campaigned for the jobs they have. They wanted them, and they got them.

Still, their compensation should be more generous than it is.

If it's not, the only people who will serve in the Legislature will be retirees and rich people.

To comment on this article, visit

Rob Port, founder of, is a Forum Communications commentator. Reach him on Twitter at @robport or via email at .

Rob Port is a news reporter, columnist, and podcast host for the Forum News Service. He has an extensive background in investigations and public records. He has covered political events in North Dakota and the upper Midwest for two decades. Reach him at Click here to subscribe to his Plain Talk podcast.
What to read next
Shaw writes, "Fargo residents can now vote for as many candidates as they like, although only two will be elected. So, I encourage Fargo voters to vote for many of those running to get the strong candidates elected and to defeat the anti-science candidates. There are five highly qualified candidates running for city commission, and I will vote for all five."
Whalen writes about how hard it is to see one's pet in pain.
For all the Sturm und Drang from lawmakers over Burgum supposedly violating the "separation of powers" by meddling in legislative races, they couldn't muster enough votes to even put some reporting requirements on committees like Burgum during their session last year.
"Mainstream media’s operative definition of free speech has evolved largely to speech conforming to the leftist Democrat worldview," writes InForum columnist Mike Hulett.