Port: Serious talk about a split in the NDGOP

I'm convinced that the possibility of a split, or at least an attempt at one, is very real.

PHOTO: NDGOP Headquarters
The sign for the North Dakota Republican Party headquarters sits along East Boulevard Avenue near the state Capitol in Bismarck. Jeremy Turley / Forum News Service
Jeremy Turley / Forum News Service file photo

MINOT, N.D. — One evening this week, I got a phone call from a Republican friend who asked me how viable I thought a third party movement breaking off from the North Dakota Republican Party might be.

It was a surprise.

This person is a Republican whose name most of you would probably recognize immediately. A serious person is what I'm trying to tell you, not some back-bench meddler.

A person who, if they left the NDGOP, would take a not-insignificant amount of money and people with them.

Still, even in this overheated moment, as the cracks created by Donald Trump's boisterously divisive and entirely self-serving approach to politics proliferate across the GOP, it's hard to credit the idea of a third party.


The risks are enormous. Such a move would breed enormous resentment levels among rank-and-file Republicans and would likely be a disaster at the ballot box contributing to the Democratic-NPL making gains in the Legislature, and perhaps even statewide races, after a generation or two of being largely irrelevant.

Should Republicans who support conservative policymaking, even those upset by their party's current state, want to do something that would inevitably put more people in office who will, without a doubt, oppose conservatism?

North Dakota already has a somewhat active third party. The Libertarians consistently put candidates on the statewide ballot, and they're usually good for around 3 percent of the vote or so. A third party led by some high-profile North Dakota Republicans could likely do significantly better with some real money behind it, but what's the ceiling?

The NDGOP could probably lose a third of its voting base around the state and still hold onto a supermajority in state government. A diminished one, to be sure, but still an embarrassment of riches when it comes to governing power.

We had a conversation. There was a lot of talk about Theodore Roosevelt and his Bull Moose Party , ironically, since Trumpism probably has more in common with Teddy's version of progressivism than the Reagan-era conservatism of the pre-Trump NDGOP.

And that, I thought, was that.

Just some venting from someone, albeit a consequential someone, fed up with the Trump movement.

Then I got a second call. This one from a former lawmaker. More talk of a third party, and no, these two people hadn't been talking to each other. This second person says a few other people are talking third party as the Trump-aligned Bastiat Caucus pushes to control more legislative districts and, through them, control of the state party.


I'm convinced that the possibility of a split, or at least an attempt at one, is genuine.

It's still a slight possibility, and I'm not at all sure it's the right idea, but there are growing fractures in the party, and I'm certain Democrats are looking on with delight.

To comment on this article, visit

Rob Port, founder of, is a Forum Communications commentator. Reach him on Twitter at @robport or via email at .

Rob Port is a news reporter, columnist, and podcast host for the Forum News Service. He has an extensive background in investigations and public records. He has covered political events in North Dakota and the upper Midwest for two decades. Reach him at Click here to subscribe to his Plain Talk podcast.
What To Read Next
Besides an absolute ban on abortion, some want an absolute ban on contraception, a ban that would also hurt men, women and children.
"It is time for the government to run our presidential nominating elections, not the political parties," columnist Jim Shaw writes. "That means holding primaries."
"The truth is, oil and gas development, along with all of the energy development in North Dakota is done responsibly and in an environmentally friendly way,"
"Sadly, we're getting the government we deserve."