Letter: A functioning democracy requires an independent judiciary

Dennis Kooren responds to a column about the The Supreme Court from Tribune columnist Cal Thomas in The Forum's Sept. 23rd e-edition.

A person holds a letter with the text "letter to the editor" overlaid on the image.
We are part of The Trust Project.

I was blessed to know Dr Hilare Bouka. He was one of Africa’s top judges
before being forced to flee his beloved Congo to Senegal. I once asked him
what the most important aspect of democracy is. He looked me straight in the
eye and said “An independent judiciary.”

I believe former President Trump does not trust democracy, he is an autocrat
and is working to destroy trust in our judiciary. Contrary to what columnist Cal Thomas says, I think Trump expects those he appoints to follow him fully.

Sadly, I see Cal Thomas’ opinion published Sept. 23 as attacking our judicial independence as well.

Dennis Kooren lives in Fargo.

This letter does not necessarily reflect the opinion of The Forum's editorial board nor Forum ownership.

What to read next
Rich Veit of Lake Park, Minn., writes, "Since the whole world has been able to view their 37-page return for the past seven months, I invite Mr. Kovach to peruse it in search of the financial misdeeds that he insinuates have been perpetrated by the president and report his findings back to the readers of The Forum."
Linda Thorson, state director of Concerned Women for America, writes, "It is malpractice to refuse anyone the medical help needed in all circumstances, including a spontaneous abortion."
Peter d’Errico, a professor emeritus of legal studies for the University of Massachusetts Amherst, writes, "March 10, 2023, will be the 200th anniversary of the U.S. Supreme Court decision that started the watered-down idea of 'tribal sovereignty' as the basis for a U.S. claim of domination over Indigenous nations. Johnson v. McIntosh, an 1823 property law decision written by Chief Justice John Marshall, said the United States owns Indigenous lands 'discovered' by Christian colonizers!"
The proposed Respect for Marriage Act, "does not respect marriage," Moorhead resident Ken Sims writes. "This bill will enshrine a false definition of marriage everywhere and will threaten the religious beliefs of many Americans."