Letter: Jim Roers has done a lot for this community

Solinger writes in support of Fargo developer Jim Roers following criticism over his failure to build a promised buffer of townhomes as part of a full-block development next to North Dakota State University.

A person holds a letter with the text "letter to the editor" overlaid on the image.
We are part of The Trust Project.

In 2014, I was hired as the executive director for Jeremiah Program Fargo-Moorhead. At the time, our board of trustees was a group of passionate and dedicated community leaders and volunteers that had been working tirelessly for several years to launch this innovative nonprofit to end generational poverty.

Sandra and Jim Roers were passionate supporters of this mission and key leaders in marshalling community support from the get-go. Although Jim did not serve on the board, he played a crucial role in ensuring the apartment building for low-income moms was built, and his team at Roers led the way in completing it.

In 2017, when we built the building, we were fortunate not to be breaking ground after an economic shutdown due to a two year global pandemic. This economic and public health crisis has resulted in supply chain delivery eruptions, sky-rocketing prices for construction materials that fluctuates more than the stock market, and labor shortages due to a lot of people who have died or have long-term COVID and can't work. These are just some of the challenging building conditions every construction company has had to confront.

Why Piepkorn and other members of the Fargo City Commission choose to single Jim Roers out is a head scratcher. Instead of threatening to sue, perhaps a "we're all in the boat together" approach would reassure nervous neighbors, help to move the project along, and send a message of problem solving versus "a good thrashing."

Diane Solinger lives in St. Louis Park, Minn.


This letter does not necessarily reflect the opinion of The Forum's editorial board nor Forum ownership.

What to read next
Wannemacher writes, "In a nation consumed for the past two years with the delusions of a side show hustler and his election scam, a major political party that agrees the unfettered right to possess guns is more important than the lives of its own citizen and a Supreme Court capable to stripping the rights of an entire gender of American to the bone, independence hardly seems an appropriate sentiment to celebrate."
Kaye writes, "It is also bewildering that Oakland, whose expertise is in energy efficiency, would embrace a scheme that would reduce the efficiency of coal plants from their current 30% to 18%, making coal, by far, the least efficient form of energy production. Every other government is trying to make their energy production more efficient, and we are striving to make ours less efficient."
Quinn writes, "Believe what you wish, but you owe it to yourself to ask these simple questions: What is the motive of the person who wrote this? Did they want to sell newspapers and advertisements? Did they want to besmirch an opposing political party?"
Thompson writes, "Teach your children well. Boys to respect women and self-dignity for daughters."