SUBSCRIBE NOW AND SAVE 3 months just 99¢/month

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Letter: Split House districts for all of N.D. should be reconsidered for redistricting

Sawicki writes, "Split (House) districts would bring government closer to the people throughout the whole state. We think that most of us would prefer to be represented by one person who understands their priorities and lives fairly near to them, instead of being represented by two persons who do not."

Letter to the editor FSA

The debate over split state Senate districts for the North Dakota House of Representatives during the last few months has been interesting to watch. With the upcoming special session of the Legislature, we’re hoping for more discussion on this important topic.

Lately, there have been conversations in some political circles about how splitting just a few districts may be unfair. To be clear, the decision to split only these districts has to do with avoiding a lawsuit based on the Voting Rights Act of 1965.

To solve the debate about fairness, we believe that all proposed 47 districts should be split for the House. We know that this is not in the Redistricting Committee’s proposal, but it should be reconsidered going into the upcoming special session. Split districts would bring government closer to the people throughout the whole state. We think that most of us would prefer to be represented by one person who understands their priorities and lives fairly near to them, instead of being represented by two persons who do not.

As a close observer of the 2021 North Dakota redistricting process, there are some flaws that need to be pointed out. These flaws include blatant incumbent protection, disrespect of time slots scheduled for public comment, agendas not being posted in a timely fashion, and draft maps not being posted prior to most meetings.

Ultimately, that’s why North Dakota needs to join the many other states in the U.S. that have independent redistricting commissions. Such a commission could either be established through action by the Legislature, or else it would have to go to the voters in the form of an initiated measure.

ADVERTISEMENT

We look forward to the ongoing discussion about redistricting during the upcoming special session of the Legislature.

Carol Sawicki is chair of North Dakota Voters First.

This letter does not necessarily reflect the opinion of The Forum's editorial board nor Forum ownership.

What to read next
The following is a Viewpoint piece, submitted by Dick Johnson.
Brown relates his experience as a Jewish man at Minnesota State University Moorhead. He writes, "I did not always feel safe in responding to anti-Semitic speech, and I did not always have a network of supporters to lean on. The prospect of having to educate faculty and students was overwhelming."
Haut writes, "The EIDL program is a loan program with a 30-year maturity and an interest rate of 3.75% for most borrowers. Under the COVID disaster declaration, EIDL loan payments are deferred for two years with principal and interest payments required over the remaining 28 years. SBA began approving COVID EIDL applications in March 2020. For those early loans, we are rapidly approaching the end of the deferment period. Business owners should start preparing to make payments."
"It seems to me that the freedom of speech applies to the bishops' letter, as well as the ability of the Bishops or members of their flocks to petition the government for a redress of grievances," writes Mark Sornsin of Fargo.