SUBSCRIBE NOW Get a year of news PLUS a gift box!

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Port: Burgum-funded political committee refuses to answer questions about Measure 1 opposition

Burgum, North Dakota's top elected official, has spent millions on this committee. His most recent contribution reported to the Secretary of State was a $350,000 contribution on October 6. Yet his people don't feel like they need to explain their argument against Measure 1 beyond the hyperbolic phrasing on the flyers currently being carpet-bombed on the North Dakota electorate?

PHOTO: Dakota Leadership PAC Anti-Measure 1 Mailer
This flyer, mailed to North Dakotans by the Dakota Leadership PAC, asks voters to oppose a constitutional amendment that would expand the size of the State Board of Higher Education and increase the length of its terms. The DLP is mostly funded by personal donations from Governor Doug Burgum (Photo by Rob Port)
We are part of The Trust Project.

MINOT, N.D. — There has been much whinging from the Bastiat wing of the North Dakota Republican Party about the political spending of Gov. Doug Burgum this election cycle.

He used a political committee, funded mostly with his own money and staffed with his people, to back a slate of candidates in the primaries, many of them opponents of Bastiat Caucus candidates .

Burgum was mostly successful; the Bastiats are feeling chapped and promising revenge.

We'll find out how much political juice they really have come Election Day.

As we've entered the general election voting period, Burgum's committee, called the Dakota Leadership PAC, has seemingly been most focused on promoting the re-election of incumbent Superintendent Kirsten Baesler and opposing Measure 1.

ADVERTISEMENT

Like me, I'm sure you have been getting bushels of mailers related to these two initiatives.

If North Dakota had a paper industry, Gov. Burgum could promote this campaigning as an economic stimulus program.

The committee's opposition to Measure 1 seems straightforward. The constitutional amendment, which would expand the size of the State Board of Higher Education, was opposed by Burgum during the legislative session. He supported another (equally unhelpful, in my view) proposal, which would have created multiple higher education boards. That idea was defeated, and Measure 1 was created by the Legislature instead.

It follows that Burgum would oppose it. I do too. I don't think changes in how our universities are governed will make much difference until the public starts caring about classrooms more than football .

But the way Burgum's committee is campaigning against the measure leaves much to be desired.

Recently my friend, Minot Daily News reporter Jill Schramm, reached out to me to express some frustration with how the Dakota Leadership PAC responded to her inquiries about their campaign against Measure 1.

Levi Bachmeier, a former Burgum staffer who is also an organizer for the DLP, requested emailed questions. Schramm sent them, only to get this response from Bachmeier: "We have decided not to detail our campaign strategy in the press, but I'm happy to confirm that the PAC opposes Measure 1 as it is a bad idea for higher education and the taxpayers of North Dakota."

I contacted Bachmeier myself, and he referred me back to the statement he'd given Schramm.

ADVERTISEMENT

How's that for arrogance?

Burgum, North Dakota's top elected official, has spent millions on this committee. His most recent contribution reported to the Secretary of State was a $350,000 contribution on Oct. 6.

Yet his people don't feel like they need to explain their argument against Measure 1 beyond the hyperbolic phrasing on the flyers currently being carpet-bombed on the North Dakota electorate?

That's unacceptable.

I have no problem with Burgum's opposition to Measure 1. It's a bad policy.

Nor do I have a problem with Burgum using his personal wealth to engage in this sort of advocacy. He's doing it right out in the money. It's hardly surreptitious. Voters, informed of it all, will make of it what they will.

But I have a problem with political figures arrogantly believing they don't have to explain themselves to the public when they're doing this sort of politicking.

Do better, Burgum.

ADVERTISEMENT

To comment on this article, visit www.sayanythingblog.com

Rob Port, founder of SayAnythingBlog.com, is a Forum Communications commentator. Reach him on Twitter at @robport or via email at rport@forumcomm.com .

Opinion by Rob Port
Rob Port is a news reporter, columnist, and podcast host for the Forum News Service. He has an extensive background in investigations and public records. He has covered political events in North Dakota and the upper Midwest for two decades. Reach him at rport@forumcomm.com. Click here to subscribe to his Plain Talk podcast.
What to read next
Tim Mahoney has earned another term as Fargo mayor. Dave Piepkorn has earned another term as Fargo city commissioner and Denise Kolpack is our pick for the open seat on the Fargo City Commission.
Among other extreme stances, far-right candidate calls for imprisonment of political opponent
Our beloved peregrine falcons, those magnificent birds that have called downtown Fargo home for more than 20 years, have lost their nesting platform on the Bell Bank building.
Scott and Ollenburger were front and center in the flopped recall of four board members last year over the district's mask mandate. The recall failed because more than 6,000 petition signatures were deemed invalid, mostly because they were signed by people who didn't live in the Fargo school district. It was a stunning show of incompetence.