ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Port: Supreme Court rebuffs Burgum's bid to appoint D8 lawmaker

dave andahl.jpg
Dave Andahl. Special to The Forum

MINOT, N.D. — In the battle over who gets to decide who will fill one of North Dakota House District 8's two seats in the Legislature, I thought Gov. Doug Burgum had the strong legal case.

Today, Nov. 24, the state Supreme Court disagreed, finding in a unanimous decision that the vacancy can be filled using the statutory process created by the Legislature. That means the local NDGOP district committee's appointment will take the seat.

The district committee has already chosen incumbent Rep. Jeff Dezler, and that's a real disservice to the men and women of District 8 who voted to reject Delzer back in June when he was defeated in the primary by Republicans Dave Andahl, whose death in early October created this situation, and Dave Nehring.

Burgum's argument was that the Legislature's existing statutes for filling a legislative vacancy don't apply because those laws were clearly written for a vacancy that would occur with a sitting lawmaker. That wasn't the case with Andahl. He died before he could be elected.

When there is no other method in the law for filling a vacancy in elected office, the state constitution requires that the governor make an appointment, which was the authority Burgum was seeking to exercise.

ADVERTISEMENT

Unfortunately, the court decided to go ahead and fill in that gap for the Legislature, which is the sort of thing the judiciary shouldn't do but, frankly, does all the time anyway.

You can read the full opinion below. Here's the pertinent excerpt:

EMBED: Supreme Court opinion

This was a three-way fight. It was Burgum versus the Legislature (represented by Attorney General Wayne Stenehjem) versus the Democratic-NPL, who wanted their candidate, who lost to Andahl by thousands of votes, to be granted the seat.

The court rejected that argument as well.

The unfortunate side effect of this is that there is a real gap in the current statute. Our existing laws don't address the sort of situation created by Andahl. The Legislature should write some new law to address that.

The courts went ahead and did that for them, by creating some precedent, but that's not the appropriate process.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Legislature should write the law. The judicial branch should apply them as written.

They didn't, in this situation.

Here's the full opinion:

To comment on this article, visit www.sayanythingblog.com

Rob Port, founder of SayAnythingBlog.com, is a Forum Communications commentator. Reach him on Twitter at @robport or via email at rport@forumcomm.com .

Opinion by Rob Port
Rob Port is a news reporter, columnist, and podcast host for the Forum News Service. He has an extensive background in investigations and public records. He has covered political events in North Dakota and the upper Midwest for two decades. Reach him at rport@forumcomm.com. Click here to subscribe to his Plain Talk podcast.
What To Read Next
The administration at Theodore Roosevelt National Park is bent on getting rid of the horses, which means getting rid of vital living history and a major draw to the park.
Fargo city commission hand-wringing over northside Red River crossing is short-sighted
The Minnesota State system request for $350 million in additional funding would freeze tuition and train more desperately needed workers.
Part of resistance to bridge connecting downtown to Red River lies with Fargo's perception