Port: The political tantrum against masking grows more obnoxious

Yesterday was not a proud moment for the North Dakota House or the Republican majority there.

Signage along NP Avenue in downtown Fargo encourages metro residents to wear masks. Fargo city commissioners met in a special session on Wednesday, Feb. 17, and voted 3-1 to extend the city's mask mandate through March 22. David Samson/The Forum
We are part of The Trust Project.

MINOT, N.D. — Two political factors led to the North Dakota House of Representatives voting yesterday to ban mask mandates, be they implemented by local leaders or the governor.

At least some of the proponents of House Bill 1323 , including primary sponsor Rep. Jeff Hoverson of Minot, a member of the secretive band of merry goofballs called the Bastiat Caucus, believe, with the same ardor that some lunatics apply the-earth-is-flat conspiracies, that masking doesn't reduce the spread of an airborne virus like COVID-19.

Others who supported the bill in the 50-40 vote simply don't like Gov. Doug Burgum, given his many political clashes with the Legislature, and view this bill as retribution against him despite Burgum's light-tough approach throughout the pandemic, generally, and his well-documented reticence to implement a mask mandate, specifically.

EMBED: Text of House Bill 1323 ban on mask mandate
This is the key text of House Bill 1323, a ban on mask mandates, which was sponsored by Rep. Jeff Hoverson (R-Minot)


Hoverson, a Lutheran pastor, called mask mandates a "diabolical silliness" and suggested their establishment was the work of a conspiracy of "unelected, wealthy bureaucrats who are robbing our freedoms and perpetuating lies."

I have spent nearly 20 years as a consistent advocate for the cause of liberty and limited government, and it saddens me to think of how tremendously that movement is hurt by unserious charlatans like Hoverson lumping masking in with actual examples of authoritarianism.

Yesterday was not a proud moment for the North Dakota House or the Republican majority there.

The efficacy of masking to help control something like the COVID-19 outbreak is undeniable for the literate, despite what some of your Facebook friends and their hastily Googled links to "proof" show.

The efficacy of government mandates as a way to promote widespread mask adoption is less certain.

The former is a question of science; the latter is a question of politics.

North Dakota's ugly numbers for active cases, hospitalizations and deaths took a nosedive after Burgum issued a mask mandate back in November. Did the one cause or the other, or did North Dakotans get serious about masking and social distancing after watching their neighbors die while our hospitals were overrun?

The correct answer can be "both" (that's what I believe), but there's no easy way to answer the question with certainty.


I believe, at a minimum, Burgum's mandate helped at a time when our state desperately needed it.

This brings us back to House Bill 1323 and the question it poses us: Should North Dakota's political leaders have something like a mask mandate in their toolbox to be used in situations like the COVID-19 outbreak?

The answer, undoubtedly, is "yes."

If you feel any political leader is misusing that sort of tool, the ballot box is always available as recourse.

I suspect Hoverson's bill will ultimately meet a quick demise in the Senate, where the Bastiat Caucus seemingly has fewer seats.

Let's hope I'm right.

To comment on this article, visit

Rob Port, founder of, is a Forum Communications commentator. Reach him on Twitter at @robport or via email at .

Opinion by Rob Port
Rob Port is a news reporter, columnist, and podcast host for the Forum News Service. He has an extensive background in investigations and public records. He has covered political events in North Dakota and the upper Midwest for two decades. Reach him at Click here to subscribe to his Plain Talk podcast.
What to read next
Former Miss America Cara Mund announced on social media she will run as an independent for North Dakota's lone seat in the U.S. House of Representatives, joining incumbent Republican Armstrong and his Democratic challenger Mark Haugen. The election is three months away and until Mund dropped this bombshell, the state was headed to another snoozer election cycle.
China's pattern of using economic development projects to disguise its aggressive espionage in the United States demands that the China-backed corn mill in Grand Forks receive thorough scrutiny.
It's clear anti-abortion activists won't stop with their Roe victory. And after what happened in Kansas on Tuesday, Minnesota Democrats should be even more emboldened to talk with voters about the importance of women having access to legal, safe abortions.
The historic bill passed Tuesday night on a vote of 86-11 is the exact bill Republicans like ND Sen. Kevin Cramer voted against last week. Word for word. Their opposition last week was performative and nothing more.